(Swedish below)
Every year the magazine Miljöaktuellt [Environmental News] publishes a list of Sweden’s 100 most influential people regarding the environment. Since part of the research we are engaged in is crucial for our future environment I am happy that someone has nominated me to be on the list. The actual list will be announced at Nalen on 18 January. Of course, I don’t expect to wind up high on the list but to be somewhere among the 100 would be fun.
Since 2003 I have asserted that the emissions scenarios published by the IPCC in 2000 are incorrect and can never happen in reality. At that time the matter gained publicity when CNN published on it in association with Anders Sivertsson presenting his Ph.D. thesis (read the article by CNN). In my coming book, “Peeking at Peak Oil” I describe the goings on regarding the emissions scenarios. A detailed analysis of the scenarios can be found in our research article, ”Validity of the fossil fuel production outlooks in the IPCC Emission Scenarios”.
I would like to point out that the results of our analysis do not mean that there are no problems for our future with respect to climate change but the scenarios that are usually described as “business as usual” can never be true. In reality, our future requires us to change our energy system so that the world’s coming 9 billion people can survive. At the moment it is Peak Oil that is affecting our economy but that, unfortunately, is just the beginning. (I go into more detail regarding this in the book.)
At the moment the IPCC is working on “The Fifth Assessment Report” that is estimated to be ready by 2014. This report will also present scenarios on future emissions. Previously the IPCC published 40 scenarios and now, apparently, they plan to reduce these to four. The person who is responsible for the chapter on future scenarios has told me personally that I will be able to read the chapter before it is published and we will see if they have taken our research into account. The IPCC has stated that it must give regard to peer-reviewed research articles.
If this environmental engagement is sufficient for me to wind up on the top 100 list remains to be seen. In any case, currently the intention is that I will discuss these issues and other interesting parts of my book, Peeking at Peak Oil on the stage at Nalen with the chief editor of Miljöaktuellt Mikael Salo.
(Swedish)
Varje år upprättar tidningen Miljöaktuellt en lista på Sveriges 100 miljömäktigaste personer. Då en del av den forskning som vi bedriver är avgörande för vår framtida miljö blev jag glad för att någon nominerat mig till att vara med på listan. Själva utnämningen sker på Nalen den 18 januari och självfallet tror jag inte att jag skall hamna så högt på listan, men att vara med bland de 100 skulle vara trevligt.
Ända sedan 2003 har jag hävdat att de utsläppsscenarier som IPCC publicerade 2000 är felaktiga och kan aldrig ske i verkligheten. Då uppmärksammades det till och med av CNN i samband med att Anders Sivertsson presenterade sitt examensarbete (läs artikel i CNN). I min kommande bok ”Peeking at Peak Oil” kommer jag att berätta om spelet runt utsläppsscenarierna. En detaljerad genomgång av scenarierna finns i vår forskningsartikel ”Validity of the fossil fuel production outlooks in the IPCC Emission Scenarios”.
Jag vill poängtera att detta inte betyder att det inte finns problem för framtiden men det betyder att de scenarier som man brukar kalla för ”Business as usual” aldrig kan bli verklighet och att vår framtid i verkligheten kräver en förändring av energisystemen för att 9 miljarder personer skall överleva. Just nu är det Peak Oil som påverkar vår ekonomi, men det är tyvärr bara början (mer om detta i boken).
Just nu arbetar IPCC med “The Fifth Assessment Report” som beräknas vara klar 2014. Även i denna rapport kommer det att finnas scenarier om framtida utsläpp. Tidigare har det varit 40 scenarier och nu skall man enligt dagrens planer reducera dem till 4. Den person som är ansvarig för kapitlet om framtidens scenarier har personligen sagt till mig att jag skall få läsa kapitlet innan det publiceras och vi får se om man tar hänsyn till vår forskning. IPCC har sagt att man skall ta hänsyn till forskningsgranskade artiklar.
Om detta är tillräckligt för att jag skall hamna på topp 100-listan återstår att se, men det är iallafall meningen att jag från scen skall diskutera dessa frågor och andra intressanta delar av min bok ”Peeking at Peak Oil” med Miljöaktuellt chefredaktör Mikael Salo.
tahoevalleylinest
December 22, 2011
Dr. Aleklett & faithful readers:
This is correspondence with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Immediately following, reply from Dr. Patrick Eickemeier, Scientific Editor, Technical Support Unit (Potsdam Institute For Climate Impact Research). Dr. Eickemeier’s salutation and affiliation particulars are at the very end of the message.
—
Thank you for your email and your interest in the work of the IPCC. The IPCC Working Group III has assessed railway transportation in previous reports and will do so in its contribution to the fifth Assessment Report, to be published in 2014. However, we do not conduct any research nor are we usually involved in the initial review of scientific research and its publication.
You may find the outline of the AR5 interesting (though it does not provide much detail): http://www.ipcc-wg3.de/.files/WGIII-Outline-AR5.pdf
Railways will be treated in Sections dealing with Mitigation technology options, practices and behavioral aspects. Barriers and opportunities for rail for freight and passengers will also be assessed.
Until the AR5 is available, you may want to look into the transportation chapter of the fourth Assessment report: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg3/en/ch5.html
I hope this information helps, best regards,
Patrick
———- Forwarded message ———-
To: ipcc-media@wmo.int
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Transportation Policy Task Group
We are compiling information on use of expanded railway capacity and connectivity as ways & means of maintaining Societal & Commercial Cohesion during transition period. We see Peak Oil and Climate shift as parallel challenges.
We have determined generic, steel wheel on steel railway is at hand around the globe, and offers most energy efficient, robust and expedient means of continued/enhanced distribution of victuals and necessities of life, as well as general goods movement. We looked at first half of 20th Century railway for operating methodologies to overlay in the 21st Century, and suggest careful examination of the “Pacific Electric Railway” (PE) system in the Los Angeles Metropolitan area. In Climate/Energy emergency era, the PE system offers a model for study by the IPCC. PE offered a “retail” railway service, including pick-up and delivery for passengers and cargo movement. PE connected to downtown produce delivery depots in night hours, and cleared the tracks for commuting traffic as the sun rose.
Updated, the railway mode in the Climate solution set, can be seen at Christopher C. Swan’s website, “Suntrain Transportation Corporation”, and companion volume “ELECTRIC WATER” (New Society Publishing 2007). Swan has used the principles seen in the Pacific Electric operational practice, adding container handling, and expanding the use of renewable electric generation for prime movers. As the PE did, “Suntrain” provides a very tight organization of door-to-door network of vans and trucking. Swan’s proposal also brings dedicated people movers, vans and buses to the system, something PE did, now modernized with on-demand door-door service..
The Suntrain Corporate executive office in San Francisco, CA can be reached at email swantrain@comcast.net Please see also, Association For The Study Of Peak Oil & Gas Newsletters 42 & 89, Articles 374 and 1037, respectively. It seems crucially important to encourage United States leadership in railway mode capacity expansion & reach, to bring impetus to this shift of transport priorities.
We have a body of information as shown, but nowhere in any of the well-known environmental organizations have we seen any sort of significant proposals or leadership regarding comprehensive railway mode expansion as part of an all due haste action plan. Because of this finding, we would be pleasantly surprised to learn of any IPCC work with rail mode; effort with gravitas, maps, list of significant railway lines needing expansion, etc. Haiti is a sad example of a country sorely in need of railway rebuild, connecting the Island with a rail spine line from Port-Au-Prince to border with Dominican Republic.
China offers an interesting example of current large scale railway engineering expansion, but they are gearing generic rail projects to strategic concerns foremost. China has a network of tunnels and underground (bomb) shelters unparalleled on the planet, sufficient for most of their urban populations. China’s generic rail program dwarfs their headline-grabbing Fast rail network by orders of magnitude. They have pioneered some direct application of renewable generated power for electric railway operations. As a note, China has prepared a number of railway projects for Afghanistan, directed at rare earths and more common mineral resources. Unfortunately, China not America comes with railroads…
Thank You for your comprehensive assessment of railways, and hopefully, some information you may supply back to us for our work. Maybe, your transportation committees will profit from contact with Christopher C. Swan and his “Retail Railway” concept.
Cordially,
Gunnar Henrioulle, Associate
Tahoe Valley Lines
P.O. Box 9289
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96158-2289
e mail gunnarh@cwo.com
—
Patrick Eickemeier
Scientific Editor, Technical Support Unit (TSU)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Working Group III – Mitigation of Climate Change (WG III)
c/o Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)
Email: patrick.eickemeier@ipcc-wg3.de | http://ipcc-wg3.de
NEW: The IPCC Renewables Report @ http://srren.org
Jacob
December 27, 2011
Läste följande artikel på svd.se
( http://www.svd.se/naringsliv/energiboom-ger-ny-kraft-at-usa_6730501.svd )
Citat från artiklen:
“Den tidvis populära teorin ”peak oil”, eller att oljereserverna snart kommer att tömmas, ter sig just nu allt dammigare.”
Jag har följt peak oil de sensate åren och är en ‘anhängare’, men hur stor relevans tror du detta har?
mvh
/jacob
kervennic
January 6, 2012
Do you include North Dakota and Canada reserves ? They seem to increase by the day in the newspapers…
What about shale gas in Europe ?
Besides if the IPCC might be optimistic in its growth assumptions but it seems that for the moment we follow the worst case scenario in term of emissions and, moreover, some say that their estimation regarding climate impacts are very conservative.
Just now effects seem to occur much faster than predicted.
Tommy Walfridson (@TommyWalfridson)
January 20, 2012
Grattis till placeringen bland Sveriges 100 miljömäktigaste personer Kjell 😀